Original name | |
---|---|
Check ECoF | |
Current accepted name |
No |
Status |
Ambiguous synonym |
Status details |
questionable, new combination |
Status ref. | |
Comment |
Considered as a valid species by Kottelat & Whitten 1996 ((Ref. 13275). |
Link to references |
References using the name as accepted |
Link to other databases |
|