Growth parameters for Rhizoprionodon terraenovae
 
Maximum Length 110cm TL
n = 6
Note that studies where Loo is very different (+/- 1/3) from Lmax are doubtful.
Lm vs Linf graph [n = 2]
M vs K graph [n = 3]
M vs Linf graph [n = 3]
Longevity vs 3/K graph [n = 4]
ø = 3.32
L inf = 105.0 cm FL
K = 0.2
Median record no. 4
11824Ref. 11824
Loo
(cm)
Length Type K
(1/y)
t0
(years)
Sex M
(1/y)
Temp° C Lm Ø' Country Locality Questionable Captive
74.5 OT 0.500 -0.91 M 61.0 3.44 USA Chesapeake Bay, Virginia to Port Canaveral, Florida Yes No
74.9 OT 0.490 -0.94 F 61.0 3.44 USA Chesapeake Bay, Virginia to Port Canaveral, Florida Yes No
92.5 TL 0.450 -2.01 0.54 25.0 3.59 USA North-central Gulf of Mexico Yes No
105.0 FL 0.190 0.54 26.0 3.32 Mexico Yucatán No No
108.0 TL 0.359 3.62 USA laboratory aquaria No Yes
117.6 TL 0.300 0.42 3.62 USA Chesapeake Bay, Virginia to Port Canaveral, Florida, 1997-1999 No No
Search for more references: Scirus
Back to Search
Add New Record
Back to Top

Publish in our journal partners Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria (Impact factor 2023: 1.17; link to old content 1970-2020), Journal of Applied Ichthyology (Impact factor 2022: 1.222) and Journal of Fish Biology (2.0, 2022 impact factor) the results of your primary research on fish growth, weight-length relationships, reproduction (maturity, fecundity, spawning), food and diet composition, introductions and range extensions for faster subsequent entry in FishBase.

cfm script by eagbayani, 05.04.99 ,  php script by elaxamana, 11/02/09 ,  last modified by sortiz, 06/03/17